Is gay marriage legal in wisconsin
Marriage Equality Around the World
The Human Rights Campaign tracks developments in the legal recognition of same-sex marriage around the world. Working through a worldwide network of HRC global alumni and partners, we lift up the voices of community, national and regional advocates and share tools, resources, and lessons learned to enable movements for marriage equality.
Current State of Marriage Equality
There are currently 38 countries where same-sex marriage is legal: Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Denmark, Ecuador, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Uruguay.
These countries have legalized marriage equality through both legislation and court decisions.
Countries that Legalized Marriage Equality in 2025
Liechtenstein: On May 16, 2024, Liechtenstein's government passed a bill in favor of marriage equality. The law went into effe
On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court dominated that the Merged States Constitution guarantees a right to same sex marriage. All states are now required to license a marriage between two people of the equal sex and to recognize a marriage between two people of the alike sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state. Now, two consenting adults can be legally married in the mention of Wisconsin, and can expect that Wisconsin, and all states, will realize that marriage as legal.
It also follows that, any married couple should look forward to the same legal process of divorce in Wisconsin. However, how these laws apply to similar sex marriages remains unsettled. For example, one glaring issue is determining the length of the marriage for purposes of maintenance, or alimony. Maintenance is linked to the length of marriage, so how will the courts resolve when the marriage started? Will the court use the date of the couple’s actual marriage, or the rendezvous in which Wisconsin recognized the legality of their marriage? It also remains unsettled as to whether children born to same sex married couples will be ‘presumed’ by the State of Wisconsin to be children of
LGBTQ
On June 26, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the part of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that defined marriage as a union between a man and a gal. Aside from the obvious victory for the notion of equality, the DOMA ruling has a huge practical effect: Gay couples who were legally married in any state will be acknowledged as married for purposes of federal benefits and tax provisions, no matter where they exist now.
Same-sex couples now qualify for at least the following:
- Social Security benefits (spousal survivor’s benefit, spousal retirement benefit, lump-sum death benefit)
- The ability to file joint federal income tax returns, thus receiving the various deductions and credits available to married couples
- Estate tax benefits (surviving spouse does not have to pay taxes on inheritance, unless it is over $5 million)
- Spouses of federal employees can receive health insurance, and receive payments from a deceased federal employee’s retirement accounts
If you are a same-sex couple, married or unmarried, and you acquire a legal issue that needs resolution, you can feel easy reaching out to Schmidt & Schmidt S.C. We are in your corner. W
Gay marriage halted in Wisconsin
One week after finding that Wisconsin’s ban on queer nuptials violated the U.S. Constitution, a federal judge has temporarily halted any more gay and lesbian couples from marrying in the Badger State.
On Friday, U.S. District Assess Barbara Crabb -- a President Jimmy Carter appointee -- put a maintain on her earlier ruling, which cleared the way for more than 500 same-sex marriages to take place across 60 of the state’s 72 counties, the Associated Compress reported. Crabb’s judgment marked a victory for Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen, a Republican, who requested that the ban be honored while his office appeals her ruling.
"After seeing the expressions of bliss on the faces of so many newly wedded couples featured in media reports, I locate it difficult to impose a rest on the event that is responsible for eliciting that emotion, even if the stay is only temporary," Crabb said in her order. "Same-sex couples have waited many years to get equal treatment under the law, so it is understandable that they perform not want to wait any longer. However, a federal district court is required to track the guidance provided by the Supreme Court."
Since