Gay rights cases in the supreme court

WASHINGTON—As the LGBTQ+ group continues to meet discriminatory legislation across the country, there are also a number of active court cases making their way through the court system that seek to either roll support these anti-equality laws or expand Gay protections. In addition, anti-equality state attorneys general and anti-equality organizations are challenging non-discrimination rules issued by the federal government. Ranging from healthcare to teaching, these cases mention a variety of rights and will have an key impact on the state of equality for LGBTQ+ Americans.

In order to track these cases and the consequences of their decisions, this background document provides topline knowledge while also illustrating the disturbing range of attacks facing LGBTQ+ people.

Health Care

Bans on Health Care for Transgender People

• Bans on health care for transgender youth own been passed in 24 states across the country, with 17 being challenged in state or federal court. In addition numerous states have also adop
  
  IntroductionTwo Supreme Court decisions involving same-sex attracted rights, one decade apart, own left a lot of people wondering just where the regulation now stands with respect to the right to engage in homosexual conduct.

  The Court first considered the matter in the 1986 case of Bowers v Hardwick, a challenge to a Georgia law authorizing criminal penalties for persons found guilty of sodomy.  Although the Georgia law applied both to heterosexual and gay sodomy, the Supreme Court chose to consider only the constitutionality of applying the law to homosexual sodomy.  (Michael Hardwick, who sought to enjoin enforcement of the Georgia law, had been charged with sodomy after a police officer discovered him in bed with another man.  Charges were later dropped.)  In Bowers, the Court ruled 5 to 4 that the
  

  A Term of Injustice: Supreme Court Delivers Unrelenting Burst out to LGBTQ+ Rights in Series of Rulings

  by Aryn Fields •

  This phrase, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a devastating series of decisions that collectively erode hard-fought Homosexual rights, strip access to essential healthcare, and send a chilling message to queer youth, families, and communities across the country. From the freedom to receive best-practice medical care to the right to an inclusive education that reflect LGBTQ+ lives, the Court’s orders diminish basic protections, reinforce discrimination, and threaten the wellbeing of millions.

  The impact of these decisions—across US v. Skrmetti, Mahmoud v. Taylor, and Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic—is sweeping. Together, they create modern barriers to accessing care, compromise inclusive education, and confined the legal avenues available to disagree state abuses. These decisions do not exist in a vacuum. They appear in the midst of a coordinated political campaign to roll back Diverse rights—through federal executive actions, state legislation, school system censorship, book bans, healthcare restriction
  
  

  7 Supreme Court Cases That shaped LGBTQ Rights

  The LGBTQ movement in America dates back at least as far as the 1920s, when the first documented gay rights organization was founded. The Society for Human Rights only survived for about a year before it was disbanded in 1925, but its mark was left on our country.

  Increased visibility and activism of LGBTQ individuals since the 1970s has helped the movement make progress on multiple fronts. Just as advocates fought their battle in American culture, they also did so in the courts. Here, we look at a several cases that have shaped LGBTQ rights in America and celebrate some of the milestones of the movement.

  1) 1958 One, Inc. v. Olesen

  The first Supreme Court case to regard LGBTQ rights had to do with the First Amendment right to autonomy of speech. A publisher released ONE: The Homosexual Magazine, America’s first widely-distributed magazine for gay readers. Not prolonged after publication began, its August and October editions were seized by Los Angeles postmaster Otto Olesen for supposedly violating obscenity laws. In its choice, the Supreme Court tossed out a lower court’s ruling and sided with One, Inc. SCOTUS establis